Case 09 · Revision provenance

Evidence-Led Content Loop

Turn one approved content idea into an inspectable decision without overwriting revision history, silently applying preferences, or claiming that an observation caused a result.

Inspect the revision prism

Primary decisionInspect one lineage node

Primary resultScope-safe revision

LimitationNo private prompt, project name, identifier, source path, provider response, audience record, published post, commercial result, or causal performance claim is shown.

Revision Prism · synthetic

Every change keeps its parent, scope, and decision boundary.

7 lineage-bound nodes · 2 immutable revisions · 1 candidate preference · 0 external actions

Revision faces

One active node · direct inspection

Immutable revision integrityrevision-01

We delayed the release because one integration check is incomplete. Reply with your rollout constraint.

cl-0b9b0f98

Immutable revision integrityrevision-02

We are delaying the release. One integration check remains incomplete; reply with your rollout constraint.

cl-e98f9905

Active node inspection

Active node

observation-01 · observationdescriptive-only

Manual observation

In a manual side-by-side review, the decision sentence was found faster in Revision 02.

Descriptive observation; no causal, audience, or performance claim.cl-17ee4dc0

Exact lineage: idea-01 → revision-01 → critique-01 → revision-02 → decision-01 → observation-01
Parent: decision-01

Manual observation · descriptive-only · scope scope-launch-note

Fail-closed integrity fixtures

Static fictional revision outcome

Approved scope: lead with the decision · name the evidence limit · keep one written response path

Excluded scope: change the offer · invent an outcome · publish or send

Matching scope: 1 eligible lane · 1 untouched lane. Excluded scope: 0 eligible lanes · matching context unchanged.

idea-01 · parent root · idea · recorded · Explain why a measured launch note can earn trust.
revision-01 · parent idea-01 · revision · immutable · We delayed the release because one integration check is incomplete. Reply with your rollout constraint.
critique-01 · parent revision-01 · critique · recorded · The decision arrives late, and the evidence limit should be named before the response path.
preference-01 · parent critique-01 · preference · candidate · For launch notes, test a one-line risk label before adopting it as a reusable preference.
revision-02 · parent critique-01 · revision · immutable · We are delaying the release. One integration check remains incomplete; reply with your rollout constraint.
decision-01 · parent revision-02 · decision · approved · Approve Revision 02 for the fictional review surface only.
observation-01 · parent decision-01 · observation · descriptive-only · In a manual side-by-side review, the decision sentence was found faster in Revision 02.

Immutable revisions: revision-01 cl-0b9b0f98 · revision-02 cl-e98f9905

Candidate preference · 0 applications · not automatically applied

Manual observation · descriptive only · causal claim false

Approved decision · Revision 02 · fictional review surface only · 0 external actions

Fail-closed states

orphan-critique · quarantined · parent revision missing · zero active nodes · result unverified
revision-digest-mismatch · integrity-hold · immutable body changed · zero active nodes · result unverified
preference-not-approved · candidate-only · candidate preference has zero approved applications · zero active nodes · result unverified
observation-overclaim · claim-blocked · manual observation cannot support causality · zero active nodes · result unverified

cl-9e6bfeaa

Inspect evidence boundary

MaturityVerified offline slice · private source withheld

EvidenceRecorded source contracts · fictional public reconstruction

The provenance problem

A useful content loop needs memory without invisible automation.

The prism keeps exact revision bodies immutable, separates critique from preference, applies only approved scope, and records manual observation as description rather than causal proof.

Recorded source proof

Verified offline contracts, fictional public artifacts

Private content-loop substrate

Verified offline slice · private source withheld

Recorded local verification · 2026-08-29Neutral label · fictional copy · no source media

The recorded slice preserves revision lineage, distinguishes critique from reusable preference, constrains decisions to approved scope, and keeps the configured provider path template-only.

The public case does not claim publishing, provider execution, autonomous preference learning, audience lift, revenue impact, or current production operation.

Written-first handoff

Need a content workflow that can explain every change?

Start with immutable revisions, visible critique, candidate preferences, explicit scope, human decisions and honest observation boundaries.

Open the written brief